Public comments are a very important part of the OGF document approval process. Through public comments, documents are given scrutiny by people with a wide range of expertise and interests. Ideally, a OGF document will be self-contained, relying only on the other documents and standards it cites to be clear and useful. Public comments of any type are welcomed, from small editorial comments to broader comments about the scope or merit of the proposed document. The simple act of reading a document and providing a public comment that you read it and found it suitable for publication is very useful, and provides valuable feedback to the document authors.
Thank you for making public comments on this document!
Comments for Document: WS-DAI and WS-DAIR Implementations - Experimental Document
|Author(s):||S. Lynden, M. Antonioletti, M. Jackson, S. Ahn|
|Public Comment End:||30 Oct, 2009|
on the test scenario:
-In case of GetSQLResponseItem, maybe it should be clarified that the items are supposed to return in order, i.e. first rowsets, then update counts, etc
-In case of GetTuples, the AccessMode will give an error if already the required rows have been accessed. It was not clear how this condition would be produced on the test.
Finally, without knowing the details of the AMGA implementation, is consistency expected with the OGSA-DAI one in the case that an SQLResponse is destroyed and consequently all the child SQLRowsets are destroyed as well?