Open Grid Forum

WHAT ARE OGF DOCUMENTS?

OGF DOCUMENT SERIES
Recommendation
Informational
Community Practice
Experimental

PUBLIC COMMENTS
Archived Comments

DRAFT DOCUMENTS


EGA DOCUMENTS

OGF Public Comments

Public comments are a very important part of the OGF document approval process.  Through public comments, documents are given scrutiny by people with a wide range of expertise and interests. Ideally, a OGF document will be self-contained, relying only on the other documents and standards it cites to be clear and useful.  Public comments of any type are welcomed, from small editorial comments to broader comments about the scope or merit of the proposed document.  The simple act of reading a document and providing a public comment that you read it and found it suitable for publication is very useful, and provides valuable feedback to the document authors.

Thank you for making public comments on this document!


Comments for Document: WS-Iterator 1.0
Author(s):M. Morgan
Type:P-REC
Area:Architecture
Group:OGSA-Naming-WG
Public Comment End:22 Nov, 2010

To make anonymous comments, please use 'anonymous' and 'guest' as the un/pw.


Comments:


Posted by: hmatsuda 2010-10-20 19:33:08WS-Iterator 1.0
This specification is important and useful because it provides an iterative service for transferring a large-size data by dividing into several SOAP messages, and it is consistent with WSRF. Thus the specification is particularly important for implementing the RNS service.
Comment: In Section 2.2.1, "/iterator:iterable-element@index" means the global index of the element, but its type is described as unsignedInt (a response message in Section 2.2.1, and the schema of “IterableElementType� in Appendix A). It seems to be appropriate that the type of "index" changes into unsignedLong.


Posted by: mmm2a 2011-04-05 12:17:22Re: hmatsuda's Comment
I'm not entirely sure I agree as making the index an unsignedLong rather than an unsignedInt would imply such a huge number of elements as to preclude its use in a SOAP setting. However, I am unwilling to guarantee that and the fact of the matter is that it doesn't hurt anything to switch to an unsignedLong. That said, I will change the document as suggested and submit it to the editor as soon as possible.

> login   RSS RSS Contact Webmaster

OGFSM, Open Grid ForumSM, Grid ForumSM, and the OGF Logo are trademarks of OGF